Module 16 of 17

After the course

16.1Complete records and reassessment

  • Combine educator-led theoretical results and educator-observed practical records.
  • Confirm that every required assessed competency in the Assessment Grid, including its required competency criteria, has evidence from its assigned component.
  • Contact learners privately about incomplete tasks.
  • Provide focused remediation and fair reassessment.
  • Offer a participation certificate when the learner has participated but has Not yet for one or more competencies; issue a completion certificate only when all competencies show Yes.
  • After confirming each result, use the Certificate Tool to create certificates in a batch, then check the learner names, certificate types, and issuing details before distribution.
  • Keep only the minimum information needed for the educator's records. Brief evidence notes are helpful but optional.

16.2Ask learners about the learning experience

Collect feedback that can improve delivery:

  • Which explanation became clear through discussion or activity?
  • Which section moved too quickly or slowly?
  • Which term or translation was difficult?
  • Which activity felt relevant locally?
  • Where did technology or access create a barrier?
  • Did any task create discomfort or pressure to disclose?
  • Did practical work feel safe and purposeful?
  • Which question remains unanswered?

Do not ask only whether learners “liked” the course. Look for evidence about clarity, participation, safety, transfer, and local usefulness.

Invite learners to complete the Bitcoin Diploma exit survey at the course close. Their feedback helps My First Bitcoin understand the learning experience, measure the Bitcoin Diploma's impact, and improve future content and support. The survey is voluntary and does not affect assessment or certification.

16.3Reflect as an educator

Complete this review while the course is fresh:

QuestionNotes and action
Which competency took more or less time than planned?
Which misconception appeared repeatedly?
Which learner voices were heard least?
Which local example improved what learners could explain, compare, or do?
Which example became political, promotional, or too personal?
Which activity produced useful evidence?
Which activity created a misleading simplification?
Were all practical stop conditions effective?
Did any tool, link, fee, rule, or listing become outdated?
Which assessment judgment needs moderation?
Which accessibility or language adaptation should be retained?
What will change before the next cohort?

16.4Share an educator testimonial

You can share an educator testimonial about your experience teaching the Bitcoin Diploma. Describe your teaching context, what worked, and what you learned as an educator. Sharing your story is optional.

16.5Maintain local content

Before reusing a course plan:

  • recheck local laws, rules, inflation data, tools, versions, fees, custody claims, and resources
  • remove stale merchant or community listings
  • review any incident, near miss, or confusing assessment item
  • update translation notes
  • confirm links and QR destinations
  • reset practice environments; and
  • submit curriculum issues through the approved contribution process.

If an activity exposes private information, risks funds, misstates a rule, or encourages unsafe behavior, stop using it until reviewed.

↑ Back to table of contents